Leicaflex Mark 1 and Mark 2: Difference between revisions
From Leica Wiki (English)
Jump to navigationJump to search
mNo edit summary |
|||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
**[http://www.l-camera-forum.com/leica-forum/leica-collectors-historica/154128-little-49-a.html JCBs a little . . .] | **[http://www.l-camera-forum.com/leica-forum/leica-collectors-historica/154128-little-49-a.html JCBs a little . . .] | ||
**[http://www.l-camera-forum.com/leica-forum/leica-collectors-historica/170835-leica-collection-incomplete-without.html] | **[http://www.l-camera-forum.com/leica-forum/leica-collectors-historica/170835-leica-collection-incomplete-without.html] | ||
**[http://www.l-camera-forum.com/leica-forum/leica-collectors-historica/185846-fontenelle-archives-86-black-paint-leicaflex.html Fontenelle archive] | |||
*'''Brochures and manuals''' | *'''Brochures and manuals''' | ||
**[http://www.butkus.org/chinon/leica/leicaflex/leicaflex.htm Leicaflex Manual] courtesy of Mike Butkus | **[http://www.butkus.org/chinon/leica/leicaflex/leicaflex.htm Leicaflex Manual] courtesy of Mike Butkus |
Revision as of 14:44, 12 June 2011
Leicaflex Mark 1 and Mark 2 with 50mm f/2 Summicron-R I lens
- Production era - 1964-1968
- Variants - Motorized version per Forum discussion [3] below
- Forum discussion
- Brochures and manuals
- Leicaflex Manual courtesy of Mike Butkus
- Reviews
Leicaflex Serial Numbers
SN Start | SN End | Product | Year | Batch |
---|---|---|---|---|
1080001 | 1085000 | Leica Leicaflex (1-chrom+black) | 1964-1965 | 5000* |
1115001 | 1128000 | Leica Leicaflex (1-chrom+2-black) | 1965 | 13000 |
1145001 | 1155000 | Leica Leicaflex (1-black+2-chrom) | 1966 | 10000 |
1165001 | 1173000 | Leica Leicaflex (2-black+2-chrom) | 1967 | 8000 |
1173251 | 1174700 | Leica Leicaflex (2-chrom) | 1968 | 1500 |
Total | assigned | serial numbers | 1964-1968 | 37,500** |
. * Serial numbers and batch total from Gandy's List
** Serial numbers from Serial Numbers Leica Cameras with computed batch total.
Unmarked SN's match between both lists and Gandy's batch total was used without recalculation.